Tuesday, 23 August 2005

Memetic targetting

Arnold Kling tries to apply thinking to politics - I think there is something to this, but it goes back to coalition building. In order to gain support for a cause we need to be able to craft arguments for it that appeal to different political worldviews.

For example, here's the argument against copyright term extension reframed for different political views:
Liberal collectivist
The shared culture of society should belong to the people together, not to faceless corporations.

Libertarian
Our ability to express ourselves freely should not be constrained by a state-granted monopoly.

Liberal Economist
As non-rivalrous goods with a vanishingly small marginal cost of reproduction, cultural goods reach maximum utility by being freely replicable.

Conservative
Creating property rights in goods that can be duplicated at will is inflationary, and undermines the value of real physical property that is the bedrock of a stable society.

Each of these is a facet of the issue, and a defensible position, but if you have a mismatch between the argument and the political frame of your audience, you will be met with incomprehension or hostility, and won't win for your cause.

Updated: Doc Searls and Larry Lessig debated this very issue right after the Eldred case. Doc's thoughts, Larry's response.

In answer to Doc's comment about 'Commons' putting off the libertarians and the right, I'd like to suggest 'Digital Commonwealth' as a more neutral political term.



Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment