Friday, 18 January 2008

Fear of the new - the Internet, Tea, and MapReduce

Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of MI6 said:

“Al-Qa’eda has prospered and as it were regrouped largely because of the energy and effort it has put into its propaganda, largely through the internet.”

Sir Richard added that the internet had become the main channel for “radicalisation” and coordination between al-Qa’eda cells. He said: “In dealing with this problem, there is no alternative to imposing significant controls over the internet.”


This is what I call the "cup of tea" problem, after Douglas Adams:

Newsreaders still feel it is worth a special and rather worrying mention if, for instance, a crime was planned by people 'over the Internet.' They don't bother to mention when criminals use the telephone or the M4, or discuss their dastardly plans 'over a cup of tea,' though each of these was new and controversial in their day.

Some people have been surprised that tea was controversial, but William Cobbett's 1822 'The evils of tea (and the virtues of beer)' had this to say:

It must be evident to everyone, that the practice of tea drinking, must rended the frame feeble and unfit to encounter hard labour or severe weather, while, as I have shown, it deducts from the means of replenishing the belly and covering the back. Hence, succeeds a softness, an effeminacy, a seeking for the fireside, a lurking in the bed, and in short, all the characteristics of idleness, for which, in this case, real want of strength furnishes an apology. The tea drinking fills the public-houses, makes the frequenting of it habitual, corrupts boys as soon they are able to move from home, and does little less for the girls, to whom the gossip of the tea-table is no bad preparatory school for the brothel. At the very least, it teaches them idleness.

Which brings me to the attack on MapReduce today, which spectacularly misses the point by attacking a programming technique for not being a database and contains the striking line:

Given the experimental evaluations to date, we have serious doubts about how well MapReduce applications can scale.

(MapReduce is what Google uses to run complex data-manipulation problems on lots of computers in parallel to do things that databases fail at, like building an index for all the webpages it has found, or rendering map tiles for everywhere on earth in Google maps).

18 comments:

  1. David E: @kevinmarks that's a nice reduction. I've subsequently heard the steam opening envelopes comparison. eastman1.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/mauerf…
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fred de Villamil: Hi @kevinmarks any chance to see you at @leweb and replay the 2 Canards thing?
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kevin Marks: @fdevillamil @leweb sadly I won't be in Paris this december, but @benwerd will and I think he would love to see you
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ben Werdmüller: @kevinmarks @fdevillamil Confirming that I would! I'll be at @MozillaParis from 8pm on the 16th, and in town through the 17th.
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fred de Villamil: @benwerd @MozillaParis BTW, is there a meetup page somewhere for the indieweb thing? maybe on @indiewebcamp wiki?
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Benedict Evans: @kevinmarks @nikcub it's rather silly to claim that the internet works just the same as the telephone system
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kevin Marks: @BenedictEvans @nikcub oddly they never proposed capturing all phone calls to prevent ira attacks in the 1970s
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ian Betteridge: @kevinmarks Hmm. We all agree the Internet is massively empowering. You can't also argue it's not interesting how it empowers terrorists.
    via twitter.com

    ReplyDelete