I recently watched a film that dramatically evoked the disruption caused by geeky inventors, the difficulties they have getting funded, and the forces that combine to oppose them in the name of the status quo.
Sadly, this wasn't at last night's showing of The Social Network, but watching the 1951 Ealing comedy The Man In The White Suit on my phone while flying home.
The Social Network has zinging dialogue, tilt-shift rowing at Henley, and has lawyers as its most sympathetic characters. Most of its humour comes from heavy-handed prefiguring of Facebook's eventual success; clearly you can't spoil the ending, so the trailer just recaps the whole film:
The opening hacking scene, dramatized almost verbatim from Zuckerberg's blog at the time, is perhaps the best 'using a computer' scene in a movie yet - Mark should get a screenwriting credit. But the mythical girlfriend who dumped him and his reactions to that - 'cyberbullying', seeking fame, plaintively hitting refresh on the friend request - that frame the film are a disappointing narrative touch that duck the chance to try to explain his real motivation. Apart from the lawyer, all the women in this film are purely sex objects - when Zuck is asked 'What are the girls going to do?' and replies 'Nothing', that's clearly Sorkin talking.
In contrast, The Man in the White Suit has Alec Guinness inventing a monomolecular fibre that can't break and naturally repels dirt. To do this he has to get to work into labs at textile factories under false pretenses, and when he eventually succeeds, provokes a hostile reaction from both the factory owners and the unionized employees, who want to suppress his work. If you haven't seen it, Amazon and Netflix have it.
Here, the motivation to invent something new and exciting is expressed well, and the technology behind it is plausibly explained. Guinness inspires Joan Greenwood with his idea, and she researches it and champions him to get his work funded. The women in this sixty-year-old film are well-drawn characters, with motivations of their own. They are peers and colleagues to Guinness's Stanley, not sex objects; indeed that is directly challenged. The film is stronger and more emotionally powerful for it.
Both films capture the ascetic geek intensity and focus well, but Sorkin and Fincher want to tear it down, whereas MacDougal and MacKendrick see the Innovators Dilemma clearly 45 years before Christensen did. As Lessig says, The Social Network portrays a legal system that preys on invention, not supporting it; the Man in the White Suit has the inventor's notebooks establishing rights that he needs to be paid for.
Conversely, to get his invention out to people, Stanley needs to convince the very industry he is disrupting to adopt it, whereas the existence of the Internet and it's open protocols mean that Zuckerberg was able to get his idea adopted by thousands with a small loan from a friend.
Technology has made a lot of progress in 60 years, but judging by this new film, law and women's roles have gone backwards.
"That's clearly Sorkin talking."
ReplyDeleteYeah, he's such a sexist. Look at this West Wing bit:
Sam: They have bathrobes at the gym?
C.J.: In the women's locker room.
Sam: But not the men's.
CJ: Yeah.
Sam: Now, that's outrageous. There's a thousand men working here and fifty women...
CJ: Yeah, and it's the bathrobes that's outrageous.
Or this one he wrote:
Ainsley: A new amendment we vote on declaring that I'm equal under the law to a man? I am mortified to discover there's reason to believe I wasn't before. I am a citizen of this country. I am not a special subset in need of your protection. I do not have to have my rights handed down to me by a bunch of old, white men. The same Article 14 that protects you, protects me and I went to law school just to make sure.
That pig.
Or maybe it could be that certain college girls are attracted to success. You know, that dogged realism we want to ignore in lieu of being "fair."
Kevin, you're being somewhat "unified theory of psychology" here. Is it not possible that different people are motivated by different things, and these different movies show the differing motives.
ReplyDelete- There are some engineers who are driven by the desire to do something better
- There are some engineers who are driven to make piles of money and
- There are some engineers who are driven by the desire to get laid.
That the Facebook movie (with its very obvious depiction of this fact), could be made in 2010 but not in 1951 tells us more about changing conventions about what we are and are not allowed to admit in public about our fellow humans than about the actual fundamental motivations of these humans.
It seems like your complaint is directed more at reality than at the movie. Anne was the one and only programmer on the QuickTime team back when you were there, and from what my brother has told me, it's not like women are thick on the ground as engineers at Google.
You may not like this fact (though let's recall that Philip Greenspun has good reasons for why he believes it's anything but a tragedy), but you can't blame the movie for reflecting this reality.
I like your comparisons of the two movies. I didn't think anyone else had ever seen The Man in the White Suit. It was required viewing for one of my Marketing classes in college. Keep up the good work, sir!
ReplyDeleteShahar P: favorited this.
ReplyDeletevia twitter.com
Kevin Marks: mentioned this in Spoilers! But he leaves the film with an idea how to fix that..
ReplyDeletevia twitter.com
AJ: mentioned this in But his suit falls apart at the end. Whether Facebook has suffered the same fate is up to you..
ReplyDeletevia twitter.com